| Property | Parameter | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Product Name | S355J0WP Corten Steel Coil | Weathering resistant structural steel coil |
| Material Grade | S355J0WP / EN 1.8945 | European standard weathering steel grade |
| Standard Compliance | EN 10025-5, ASTM A588 (equivalent) | Meets major international weathering steel standards |
| Manufacturing Process | Hot Rolled | Hot rolling process for coil production |
| Carbon (C) | ≤0.12% | Low carbon for improved weldability |
| Silicon (Si) | 0.25-0.50% | Enhances atmospheric corrosion resistance |
| Manganese (Mn) | 0.20-0.50% | Contributes to strength and toughness |
| Phosphorus (P) | 0.060-0.15% | Key element for weathering resistance |
| Sulfur (S) | ≤0.040% | Controlled for improved ductility |
| Chromium (Cr) | 0.40-0.80% | Enhances protective patina formation |
| Copper (Cu) | 0.25-0.55% | Primary element for atmospheric corrosion resistance |
| Tensile Strength | 470-630 MPa | Tensile strength range per EN 10025-5 |
| Yield Strength | ≥355 MPa (t≤16mm) | Minimum yield strength for nominal thickness |
| Elongation | ≥20% | Minimum elongation in longitudinal direction |
| Impact Toughness | ≥27 J at 0°C | Charpy V-notch impact energy (J0 designation) |
| Thickness Range | 1.5 - 20 mm | Available coil thickness options |
| Width Range | 1000 - 2000 mm | Standard and custom widths available |
| Application | Bridges, facades, containers, architectural cladding | Outdoor structural and decorative applications |
| Certification | EN 10204 3.1, ISO 9001 | Mill test certificate and quality certifications |
| MOQ | 5 tons | Minimum order quantity |
Placed a 6-ton trial order of S355J0WP corten coil in 4mm thickness to evaluate for a new architectural cladding client in Singapore. The steel itself tested fine — yield strength 361 MPa, elongation 21%, impact 29J at 0°C, all meeting EN 10025-5. Our issue was with documentation: the initial 3.1 certificate issued had an incorrect heat number cross-reference, which our client's inspector flagged. It took four business days to get a corrected certificate issued, which delayed our delivery to the end customer by nearly a week. The supplier did resolve it without argument once escalated to their quality team. Material performance is not in question, but the admin process needs tightening before we can commit to larger regular volumes.


