| Property | Parameter | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Product Name | S235JR H Beam | Hot rolled structural H-shaped steel beam |
| Material Grade | S235JR | Equivalent to ASTM A36, Q235B (GB), SS400 (JIS) |
| Standard Compliance | EN 10025-2 | European standard for hot rolled structural steel |
| Carbon (C) | ≤ 0.17% | Maximum carbon content per EN 10025-2 |
| Manganese (Mn) | ≤ 1.40% | Ensures strength and toughness |
| Silicon (Si) | ≤ 0.035% | Deoxidizer element |
| Phosphorus (P) | ≤ 0.035% | Controlled for improved weldability |
| Sulfur (S) | ≤ 0.035% | Controlled to prevent hot shortness |
| Tensile Strength | 360 - 510 MPa | Per EN 10025-2 for nominal thickness ≤ 16 mm |
| Yield Strength | ≥ 235 MPa | Minimum yield strength for thickness ≤ 16 mm |
| Elongation | ≥ 26% | Measured on standard test specimen (Lo = 5.65√So) |
| Size Range | 100×100 - 900×300 mm | Flange width: 100 - 300 mm; Length: 6 - 12 m or customized |
| Web Thickness | 5 - 16 mm | Varies by section size per EN 10365 |
| Flange Thickness | 8 - 28 mm | Varies by section size per EN 10365 |
| Surface Finish | Hot Rolled / Black / Primed | Optional anti-rust primer or galvanized coating available |
| Application | Construction, Bridges, Industrial Plants | Widely used in building frames, platforms, and infrastructure projects |
| Certification | EN 10204 3.1, CE, ISO 9001 | Mill test certificate provided with each shipment |
| Packaging | Bundled with steel strips | Waterproof paper or plastic caps on ends upon request |
| MOQ | 5 Metric Tons | Smaller quantities available upon negotiation |
Ordered 35 tonnes of S235JR HEA 180 for a portal frame structure in Leeds. When the shipment arrived, we noticed some bundles had incorrect size labels which caused confusion during unloading. Contacted their support team and they resolved it within 24 hours by providing corrected documentation and a detailed packing list cross-referenced with heat numbers. The actual beams themselves were correct sizes and quality was fine — yield strength and chemistry all within EN 10025-2 limits. Giving 3 stars because the labelling error shouldn't have happened, but credit to them for sorting it quickly.


